George Conway: Trump replacing Sessions with Whitaker is illegal


politics
George Conway: Trump replacing Sessions with Whitaker is illegal

Matthew Whitaker

President Trump broke the law when he appointed Matthew Whitaker to replace Attorney General Jeff Sessions on Wednesday, lawyers Neal Katyal and George Conway argue in a New York Times op-ed Thursday.

The problem, they say, is that Whitaker was not confirmed by the Senate. They argue that that violates the Constitutions Appointments Clause, which they say requires all “principal officers” of the government to be Senate-confirmed.

Indeed, it was very strange that Trump bypassed the next in line for the post, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, and slotted in Whitaker instead. Rosenstein had been confirmed by the Senate for the deputy job.

But Whitaker was serving as Sessionss chief of staff, which is not a Senate-confirmed post. Before that, hed been out of government for eight years. That makes his appointment as the acting head of a Cabinet agency highly unusual, at the very least — and unconstitutional according to Katyal and Conway.

“Its illegal. And it means that anything Mr. Whitaker does, or tries to do, in that position is invalid,” they write.

The argument may seem unsurprising coming from Katyal, whos a Democrat and was President Obamas solicitor general. But the fact that George Conway helped write the piece will certainly raise eyebrows, since he is of course the husband of top White House staffer Kellyanne Conway.

George Conways frequent public criticisms of Trump and his administration have beenmuch noted, but here he is outright calling a major Trump appointment illegal, on an issue for which the stakes for the president and his family are enormously high.

Whitakers appointment spurred fears that Trump was installing a loyalist to take control of and perhaps crush special counsel Robert Muellers Russia investigation. And this new argument could be the opening volley in some eventual court battle over Whitakers authority.

Separately, Georgetown law professor Marty Lederman wrote a rundown of legal issues surrounding Whitakers appointment, and he categorized this issue less definitively as a “possible” constitutional problem. Theres little precedent for a situation like this, Lederman wrote, so “its technically an open question.”

You can read Katyal and Conways full op-ed at this link.

By: Vox.com

« politics

  CITIES NEWS
LONDON
DUBAI
BEDMINSTER, New Jersey
SEOUL
TAIPEI
MOSCOW
BERLIN
STOCKHOLM
WASHINGTON
LOS ANGELES
BRASILIA
SILVERSTONE, England
SAYLORSBURG, Pa
AMSTERDAM
BERGERAC, France
KABUL
BARCELONA
PARIS
MOSUL, Iraq
BRUSSELS
DOHA
CAIRO
FRANKFURT
LAUSANNE
  DATE NEWS
2019/01/16
Pelosis Shutdown Power Play Against Trump


2019/01/15
Federal judge: Government employees can't refuse to work unpaid during partial shutdown


2019/01/14
Police investigate death of toddler found outside in subzero conditions


2019/01/13
Multiple people wounded in downtown Phoenix shooting


2019/01/12
Trump may declare a national emergency in the border wall battle. Heres what that means.


2019/01/11
A new migrant caravan is forming in Central America, with plans to leave next week