George Conway: Trump replacing Sessions with Whitaker is illegal


politics
George Conway: Trump replacing Sessions with Whitaker is illegal

Matthew Whitaker

President Trump broke the law when he appointed Matthew Whitaker to replace Attorney General Jeff Sessions on Wednesday, lawyers Neal Katyal and George Conway argue in a New York Times op-ed Thursday.

The problem, they say, is that Whitaker was not confirmed by the Senate. They argue that that violates the Constitutions Appointments Clause, which they say requires all “principal officers” of the government to be Senate-confirmed.

Indeed, it was very strange that Trump bypassed the next in line for the post, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, and slotted in Whitaker instead. Rosenstein had been confirmed by the Senate for the deputy job.

But Whitaker was serving as Sessionss chief of staff, which is not a Senate-confirmed post. Before that, hed been out of government for eight years. That makes his appointment as the acting head of a Cabinet agency highly unusual, at the very least — and unconstitutional according to Katyal and Conway.

“Its illegal. And it means that anything Mr. Whitaker does, or tries to do, in that position is invalid,” they write.

The argument may seem unsurprising coming from Katyal, whos a Democrat and was President Obamas solicitor general. But the fact that George Conway helped write the piece will certainly raise eyebrows, since he is of course the husband of top White House staffer Kellyanne Conway.

George Conways frequent public criticisms of Trump and his administration have beenmuch noted, but here he is outright calling a major Trump appointment illegal, on an issue for which the stakes for the president and his family are enormously high.

Whitakers appointment spurred fears that Trump was installing a loyalist to take control of and perhaps crush special counsel Robert Muellers Russia investigation. And this new argument could be the opening volley in some eventual court battle over Whitakers authority.

Separately, Georgetown law professor Marty Lederman wrote a rundown of legal issues surrounding Whitakers appointment, and he categorized this issue less definitively as a “possible” constitutional problem. Theres little precedent for a situation like this, Lederman wrote, so “its technically an open question.”

You can read Katyal and Conways full op-ed at this link.

By: Vox.com

« politics

  CITIES NEWS
LONDON
DUBAI
BEDMINSTER, New Jersey
SEOUL
TAIPEI
MOSCOW
BERLIN
STOCKHOLM
WASHINGTON
LOS ANGELES
BRASILIA
SILVERSTONE, England
SAYLORSBURG, Pa
AMSTERDAM
BERGERAC, France
KABUL
BARCELONA
PARIS
MOSUL, Iraq
BRUSSELS
DOHA
CAIRO
FRANKFURT
LAUSANNE
  DATE NEWS
2018/11/13
Trump considers ousting top aide who feuded with Melania


2018/11/12
Amnesty International strips Aung San Suu Kyi of its most prestigious human rights award


2018/11/11
After a weekend in Paris, President Trump faces challenges back home


2018/11/10
Parkland survivor rips Trump over Broward County tweets


2018/11/09
Trump, arriving in Paris, lashes out at Macron over defense remarks


2018/11/08
Trump Bars Immigrants Who Cross Border Illegally From Seeking Asylum