Confusion over fate of Daca leaves Dreamers in limbo

 Confusion over fate of Daca leaves Dreamers in limbo

Dreamers, people brought to the US illegally as children, and supporters of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, listen as lawmakers speak in Washington on Wednesday.

Donald Trump has repeatedly said he wants to protect young undocumented immigrants from deportation, but that very population was left confused and frustrated this week by US lawmakers and courts responding to the presidents demands.

A federal court on Tuesday night blocked the Trump administration from terminating the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (Daca) program that allowed 800,000 immigrants to work and go to school in the US without fear of deportation. Hours earlier, the president had a rare televised meeting with lawmakers about how to protect this population.

“This is a time for vigilance,” said Marielena Hincapié, executive director of the National Immigration Law Center, which has filed a separate lawsuit against the Trump administration for cancelling Daca in September 2017.

Hincapie and other immigration advocates have warned that the legal situation for people who qualified for Daca is fluid. They also emphasized that despite the courts order, there is no system in place to renew Daca status and that anyone offering the service is probably a scammer. “These next days and weeks are going to create a lot of confusion on the legal front,” said Hincapie.

Staisy Ngare, whose Daca status expires in June, told the Guardian she was optimistic about what comes next.

“I am not scared,” Ngare said. “I feel like good news is coming.”

The 24-year-old, who came to the US from Kenya when she was four, said she was buoyed by public support for people like her, known as Dreamers, and the practical difficulties of removing 800,000 people from the US. “Even though its taking a long time for them to agree to something I can see where they are headed towards,” she said.

Daca is set to end on 5 March, but Democrats see the 19 January deadline to pass a federal budget as their best opportunity to demand action on the program. If Congress cannot reach a budget deal next week, there could be a partial government shutdown.

The invisible wall: how Trump is slowing immigration without laying a brick

Advocates are urging Dreamers and their supporters to focus on the 19 January deadline as the courts work through the legality of ending Daca, but the uncertainty weighs on many of the young people.

“Living life with this level of highs and lows is incredibly difficult,” said Adrian Reyna, a Daca recipient and a campaign director at United We Dream.

Reyna said his sister, who also has Daca protections, called him after the court decision to ask if everything was now fixed. He said he had to explain that their future is still unclear. “Dont let anyone tell you the urgency to get this done is not real,” he said.

Trump provided a rare look at the governments handling of immigration legislation on Tuesday, when he allowed reporters to broadcast a 55-minute discussion with lawmakers from both parties about Dreamers.

The president said a “bill of love” should be introduced for Dreamers but did not provide a clear stance on what he believed such legislation should look like. At one point, Trump seemed to endorse the Democrats push for legislation that does not include funding for a border wall before a senior Republican intervened and reminded the president that the party expects expanded border security provisions in the legislation.

On Wednesday, Senator Jeff Flake, a Republican of Arizona who is part of the negotiations, said he has “concerns” that the courts might delay action by Congress.

“If we go beyond March 5 and the courts come back and say its over, we have no runway – its done,” Flake said. He said negotiations in the Senate were in the “final stretch” and predicted a bill within the next few days.

Democrats, meanwhile, stressed that the court order offers only a temporary reprieve. Chuck Schumer, the Senate minority leader, said that the ruling “in no way diminishes the urgency of resolving the Daca issue”.

“The fact remains the only way to guarantee the legal status for Dreamers is to pass Daca protections into law and do it now,” he added.

Daca recipient Jung Woo Kim, 33, said he was disappointed with how both parties spoke about Dreamers in the meeting as though they were “bargaining chips”. “I dont think they speak the language we speak,” he said.

Kim is more protected than most because his Daca expires in 2019. He first applied for the program at 28, after working illegally to pay for university. Once Kim received Daca status, he was able to go to the dentist for the first time since he left South Korea at 15. “I was able to get government ID so I could prove to myself I wasnt a ghost any more,” he said.

He urged legislators to act with urgency on the issue of Dreamers. Kim said: “If I were your son, what would you do? Would you let me just stay in this limbo?”

Lauren Gambino contributed reporting from Washington DC.

By: The Guardian

« us

House floor erupts after lawmaker shouts Go back to Puerto Rico

Pelosis Shutdown Power Play Against Trump

Federal judge: Government employees can't refuse to work unpaid during partial shutdown

Police investigate death of toddler found outside in subzero conditions

Multiple people wounded in downtown Phoenix shooting

Trump may declare a national emergency in the border wall battle. Heres what that means.